Wednesday, 7 March 2012

How Young is TOO Young? The French Ban on Under-Age Models

 A French report titled 'Against hyper-sexualisation, a new fight for equality' is calling for a ban of under-age models after a contentious shoot in VOGUE, depicting a 10-year-old French girl in somewhat provocative clothing, and inappropriate make-up for a child her age. An increase in the production of children's lingerie, padded bras, mini sizes of adults clothing and high heels for young girls are on the rise, and it poses the question of whether or not this is just another phenomenon, popular in social discourse, of sexualising young girls. 
 Thylane Loubry Blondeau, the 10-year-old who featured in the photoshoot is seen to be using lipstick, most obviously not for children, and posing provocatively in ladies clothing and shoes.
"The Vogue cover sparked controversy in the US before igniting debate back in France; where 84 per cent of French found the photos demeaning, one poll found" (The Telegraph)
mudahdiingat.blogspot.com
blippitt.com
articles.businessinsider.com
 The author of the report and senator, Chantal Jouanno, mentions reverting back to school uniforms in primary schools to combat rivalry  regarding clothing, and banning of the use of under-age children under the age of 16 from appearing as 'the face' of any further advertising campaigns. This is in the hope to avoid any psychological damage, created by the media and their social discourse on appearance and what is 'deemed' attractive. Jouanno also comments that 'this precocious sexualisation' can be irreversible and even cause mental disorders, including anorexia. 
"Today, children are shaping their identities on declining gender equality and the return of stereotypes slipped into music videos, toys and reality TV." (Jouanno)
The Telegraph
"The government report, published on Monday, criticised the marketing of padded bras for eight year olds, thong underwear, make-up kits, and leggy dolls, all aimed at pre-pubescent girls under the age of 12." (The Telegraph)
 The ‘hyper-sexualisation’ of young girls has been an on-going topic of discussion. Pageants specifically for young girls have been popular, especially in the US, for decades, and their popularity and attraction doesn’t appear to be stopping. Toddlers and Tiaras (http://tlc.howstuffworks.com/tv/toddlers-tiaras) is a reality TV show that follows the story of families who choose to enter their children into these shows. With spray-tanning, hours in hair and make-up, and near provocative clothing, these girls, sometimes as young as three, are dolled up for the ultimate pageantry display. Are the parents who dress up their children for such occasions really just grasping for the childhood they didn’t have? Or are they actually trying to satisfy the need for congratulations and attention through the exploitation of their children.
The Guardian 
 As an older sister of two young girls, aged seven and five, I feel very strongly about the apparently increasing ‘sex-ing up’ of children. I have no issues with sharing my make-up with them occasionally, bit of lipstick here, blusher there, but to dress them up and parade them in clothes and make-up totally inappropriate for their age group is just irresponsible. Like there wasn’t enough pressure on young girls of todays’ society to conform to the ideal of ‘beautiful’ as depicted by the media! Do we really need to introduce the idea of competing using beauty to such young children? To continue this, I feel will not only create a further stigma for young girls regarding appearance, but reinforce ideas of gender inequalities the objectification of women.

Controversial Cracking Curves

http://dailyfatspiration.tumblr.com/post/13754002314/submitted-by-miss-chief-thanks-so-much
 According to the Daily Mail, the average weight of a British woman is now 11 stone. In 1991, Miss Average weighed in at 10st 5lbs, but in thirteen years this has crept up to 11. But is this really a problem? Obesity and related health issues have been, and still are, at the forefront of societal health issues. Awareness is probably the highest it's ever been, so is this country-wide weight gain suggesting disregard  for universal health advice and information amongst the women of the UK, or a more universal satisfaction and acceptance that not all women are size 6?
 This is such a current phenomena, isn't it? This much contested issue of women's size, and the size which the media portrays and dictates to the women, teenagers, and even children is 'beautiful' plagues newspapers and magazines weekly. I am totally confident in saying that majority of girls from the ages of... 11 up perhaps, have and do think about themselves and how they look in a manner of comparison to what they see in the media. 
A report in The Independent from 2000 from a survey carried out, states that in a decade, average national dress size increased from a 12 to a 14. David Rowlinson, who co-ordinated the survey, said:
"Modern women are taller, with bigger frames, larger hips and breasts. There's nothing wrong with being a size 14, it's just the way most women are."
  In 2010, the average dress size was 16, and height is 5ft 4inches (Daily Mail)
  If we rewind to the fifties, (think Marilyn Monroe,) fashion trends, models and designers were all different. After WW2, Christian Dior's designs were at the height of fashion; embracing a very much hourglass figure. Moulded around the chest, and cinched in waist-wise, the clothes were very much exemplifying women and what the epitome of femininity was represented by. The hourglass, aptly named, where the waist comes in more than the hips and chest, was the most common body shape at that time, and Dior took advantage to create feminine pieces.
 The picture below shows the changes in female stats from 1950s women, and 2004 women...

But why is this? Development in food production and consumption is one of the main ways suggested a general growth in body size has occurred, with increased advertisement and accessibility to fast food. It would seem, however, that if more health and wellbeing information and support is available to people now, why are people getting bigger?

 Personally, I despise how society dictates what is, and isn't beautiful. It's the sad truth that looks often count for more than personality. I mean, on a first impression, seeing someone from across the room, you instantly see their appearance first, before their personality. And nobody can deny that this is the truth.  I think, and it sounds cliché, but so true, that confidence is a very attractive trait. You have to love yourself before you can comfortably let anyone else love you.. And the photos we so constantly see of stick-thin models make this self-confidence forever more difficult and distant.
Tara Lynn for H&M
 Tara Lynn, an American plus-size model, headed up an advertising campaign for H&M, broadening the audience and scope of the fashion store. This, as well as refreshing, exemplifies the reality of the size that is the average UK woman. I think that stores often miss out on sales, because not only do they advertise using models unrealistic to that of the average female consumer, but often the actual designs and items they produce do not allow for larger women. Even mannequins are often a size 4/6 to show off latest fashions. These are creating unrealistic goals for customers, creating a negative self comparison. (Dressing yourself accordingly to your size, however, is another blog post completely!)
I believe that all women, and men (albeit the situation slightly differs there), should, regardless of size, deserve to feel good in their own skin. Regardless of what the masses have been fed is 'attractive'. 
More recently, the 'curvier' members of society today have been praised for their approach to size and attitude to body size. For example, Adele, whether you love or hate her- nobody can deny the amazing talent she has for singing. And her confidence in her abilities and that's explicit from her voice, matches her seeming confidence within her own skin. She may not be a size 8, but she always looks beautiful- and this is regardless of her size. 
The issue raised by health campaigners and the NHS is the idea of staying fit and healthy. You can still be a size 18, and be healthy. A healthy diet and lifestyle is important to anyone, but a worry is often bigger people in general, (not just women) are 'comfortable' in their own skin, which is fantastic, but who somewhat bypass that it is still necessary to respect it by leading a healthy lifestyle. If you are a size 24 and you're happy with that- fine. If you're a size 14 and you want to work out because you're unhappy with that- fine! Your happiness and wellbeing is the important point throughout this.
There is a fine line between disregarding this healthy lifestyle, and claiming to be comfortable with your body, despite perhaps being overweight. I think the concentration of wellness campaigns should not be to aim to look like a celebrity, because after all, they're just people too but they're just famous- people just know who they are, but to be physically fit and healthy. Eating healthily, drinking plenty of water and getting exericise- even if it's just walking instead of getting the bus, are all steps which can be taken to help with healthiness. 

Ultimately, if you are happy, then that's what matters. If you are comfortable and love your skin, whether size 4 or size 34, then that's fantastic! People aren't generic. We're given bodies to characterise and make our own, and body shape is just another feature of how we create our personality. Despite this, however, it is worth making the point that leading a healthy lifestyle, whether you believe it or not now, will make you feel better in yourself, regardless of size. 

http://kellyheartsfashion.tumblr.com/post/16420076989 
Here are a couple more links you might find interesting, with more stories and info on body-image, Tara Lynn and other plus-sized models and BMI... 

Tuesday, 28 February 2012

"Bankski"?

P183... Heard of him? Probably not. But the Russian street artist is making himself known around Moscow with his 'his politically charged murals – and says he's doing it for a 'strong, educated and cultured homeland'' His murals have developed from his childhood, when he would write poems paying tribute to Viktor Tsoi, a Soviet musician on the Tsoi Wall, Moscow.  His work has more recently become popular after photographs have been viewed worldwide. His now much bolder and satirical art has been heavily compared to that of Banksy, coining him the nickname "Bankski". (I'm assuming we're all aware of who Banksy is? Well , if not, take a look here. The Bristol-born son of a photocopier technician has been a graffiti artist and creator of satirical street-art portraying political and social commentary since the late 1980s.) Despite the similarities in their art, P183 insists that imitation was, and isn't, his intention.
"I fully understand that we both have a common cause, but I never sought to emulate him or anyone else. I use the songs of people such as Yegor Letov and Konstantin Kinchev for inspiration – not public figures."
 Russia seems to approach P183's art with a much less admired and open view than the UK with his representations of modern-day Russia. In reference to the Russian election, he replies
 "I'm not going to talk about Putin, it's too much. In our country, there is a very heavy atmosphere. People are closed-minded, and money is the most important thing... The city government is categorically against street art, so any wall drawings are painted over. Graffiti with political meaning and social subtext are painted over especially fast," 
 It seems to me that art created by the likes of people such as Banksy and P183 is a form of creativity intended to physically illustrate the sub-texts and underlying themes of our societies, and the discourses we all buy into. Economics, politics, society and modern culture discourse is communicated through this.
P183 says that "To me, street art is a tool to send thoughts to people."


To read more about P183, visit here for The Guardian article, written by Jake Hanrahan. Here are just some of his recent murals (All care of The Guardian page!)... Enjoy.








Bea xo

Agyness' New Chapter



We all know the name Agyness Deyn; with her trademark blonde pixie hair and the face of Giorgio Armani, Vivienne Westwood and Burberry (just to name a few!) Except, Agyness Deyn wasn't the name she was born with. And neither was she born with the expectation of becoming one of Britain's most well known supermodels. She speaks with Decca Aitkenhead from The Guardian about her childhood, her gradual entry into the world of fashion and her life now.
Agyness is no longer working as a model, deciding to take a step away from the fashion industry. Instead, Deyn has changed direction; straight into the theatre. The Leisure Society, is her first play, written by  François Archambault. It's a 'deliciously offensive four-hander comedy' and Deyn admits that it definitely is a change from the catwalk. Rehearsing for up to eight hours a day, Deyn seems be to enjoying the new skills and experience acting is providing her with. 
"When I started doing little bits of acting I was like, this is what I'm supposed to be doing, you know? Going to this place where there's this fulfilment in kind of like letting go, and also that part of really getting in touch with yourself, to be able to understand a different character, and then portray that to whoever's watching it, and to be able to penetrate them in a way that touches them. And there's this unsaid kind of bond with us all [in the cast] which is so powerful, you know? It's like this family, there for each other; I feel held by the other people who are doing it, which is so great, cos like with modelling for so long it's a very solo project, and quite lonely. Being part of – well, it makes me feel emotional just talking about it – being part of this with these great people – it's just like so cool."
Aiktenhead notes how different Deyn is in contrast to her portrayal in the media. Her 'army surplus meets jumble sale chic' look, defining cool effortlessly, interpreted by 'style magazines...as edgy and fierce' doesn't correlate exactly with what she actually stands for. She isn't fierce in character. In fact, nothing about her seems fierce. Polite and attentive, says Aitkenhead, speaking slowly and thoughtfully. 
"I think I was able to put on more of a brash front a lot more when I was younger. Now it's a bit harder, so now I kind of embrace the feeling awkward, maybe a little bit socially inept. But in a good way."
Her modelling career lasted for eleven years, starting after she won a local modelling competition at the age of 16. Whilst visiting Henry Holland, best childhood friend, now a successful fashion designer, at university in London at the age of 18, she was scouted. For the next five years, she worked as a jobbing model, albeit failing to find much fame nor make a name for herself. However, by 2006, she was signed by a New York agent, becoming what was arguably the next Kate Moss overnight. 
Laura Hollins was Deyn's birth name and there have been, as Aitkenhead explains, different accounts detailing different reasons as to why she changed it. She discovers, through a somewhat tense discussion with Deyn, that the first and foremost reason was because there was simply too many Lauras already in modelling. 
Regardless of her name, Agyness is the one we all know and love, and I'm so excited to see her doing something new; a new direction. New is good. 


To read the whole interview with Agyness, visit The G2 Interview, The Guardian
Bea xo

Sunday, 26 February 2012

'Start A New' Sunday

   So it's been quite a while since I've blogged... I've literally had SO much on at the moment, I haven't had any time to properly sit down and concentrate on something that hasn't been geography related. I haven't really blogged personally before... it's usually about something that ISN'T me... But I want more practice 'life-writing' it's called, and so thought I'd make it a bit more, well, ME. 
   I'm still totally in love with writing about fashion! Just think it'll be good for me to write about more of the things that interest me that aren't just clothes. Coz I'm full of love, and I love loads of things. And have lots of opinions. And I'm hoping that since I've got a few page views now, people might be interested in what I actually have to say?... We'll see. 
   Right, well, just putting that out there, and I'll be blogging when I have a bit more time to make it worthy for you all... 


Bea xo 

Friday, 17 February 2012

Mary Katrantzou Lovin'


          Mary Katrantzou , a new bright talent of London Fashion Week, is this month launching two collaborations- one with Topshop and the other with Longchamp. Rhode Island School of Design educated Mary, originating from Athens, won the Emerging Talent - Ready-to-Wear award at the British Fashion Awards last year and has worked previously for Sophia Kokosalaki, amongst other designers.

          Katrantzou’s collaboration with Topshop sees the reveal of a 10-piece capsule, dropped online and in selected stores on February 17th. The collection is an explosion of prints; a mixture of oriental-esque florals and pretty swirls and shapes. The colours and silhouettes are simply divine, and she definitely doesn’t disappoint when it comes to showcasing her trademark piece- “a dress inspired by the filtered beauty in design, mapped around the female figure.”
         The collection is a myriad of shapes, featuring straight-cut tops, slim-fitting trousers and structured dresses. Rubber, cotton, silk and chiffon are some of the fabrics she’s used to create these stunning pieces.
         This collection is the epitome of spring-feeling patterns and feminine styles. Forget fashioning this spring with delicate and dusty floral pastels- take inspiration from Mary and spring into this season with bold, yet feminine florals.  
         The collection has, as of now, nearly entirely sold out, but keep checking Topshop for when they come back in stock! Make sure you save up for, and get your own piece of floral couture, appropriate for the highstreet, and guaranteed to make everyone else jealous! 

Bea xo 

Thursday, 9 February 2012

Statement Scarf Print


Scarf print is making a very bold entrance into trends in our high street shops, and I'm not sure how I feel about it... The ornate and lavish designs speak volumes, found on dresses, leggings, tops and even tights. They are bold, to say the very least, and can't be worn without confidence. You risk looking a little silly if you're not totally in love with the print... 
  Topshop, ASOS, Miss Selfridge and River Island have some rather delicious pieces however, albeit rather, er, loud. Here are some of them... 


Chain Print Tights TOPSHOP £10 
Black Chain and Shell Tights TOPSHOP £8.50
Scarf Print Shirtdress TOPSHOP £50

Light Pink Chain Print Bodycon Dress RIVER ISLAND £25 

Black Scarf Print Trousers RIVER ISLAND £30
(as seen on TOWIE's Lydia Bright in MORE Magazine...) 
Rope Print Flippy Tunic TOPSHOP £26 
Black Chiffon Cowl Back Blouse MISS SELFRIDGE £39 
Tunic Jumper in Chain Print ASOS £30 
  I think perhaps with a statement scarf print piece, and contrasting, less attention grabbing accessories, this look can work well. Most of it can be tied in with the grunge kinda look that's in atm, including, for example, leather leggings and black  killer heeled boots. 




  Let me know what you think, and if you have any awesome scarf print highstreet finds! 


Bea xo